nakedfakes.com

[ CED - Current Expiration Date - 12/10/2032 ] With an estimated 70-85% of all AI generated images generated daily considered of adult oriented nature, this brand serves as the #1 gateway for a super community catering to the in demand niche !!! How this brand can be PROFITABLE to the investor as a business model - aside from Inhouse Advertisments & High Profile Lucrative Main Event Art Contests - artists can sell High Quality Image resolution or NFTs of their creative works within the marketplace community for a small 15% commission fee deducted from the sale within the website. ** Even though it is expected the majority works of Art would be constructed by random machine learning decisive visuals - Rules of engagement must be enforced that under NO circumstances for ANY unauthorized PNL (Public Nexus Labeling) to be accepted or allowed for any creative works displayed or for sale... Professional standards NEED to be used to prevent submissions that were directly & publicly labeled as people that exists in our reality without their consent (** Celebrities, Models, ANY individual etc). ** It is important to always refrain from any Public Nexus Label descriptions connecting any likenesses altogether. Mere Basic visual likenesses of people holds no merit threshold of value beyond being considered stereotypical of generalized looks (for every celebrity, actor or model or ANY human being out of the 8 Billion + people walking on this Earth, there exists in reality HUNDREDS or so doppelgängers that bare the SAME EXACT basic resemblance). Plenty of people clearly do resemble basic likenesses of other people. Low & behold - they can not help it - they were pretty much BORN that way (** the odds of that is considerably a thousand times GREATER factoring in the ENTIRE EXISTANCE of mankind) ... Welcome to Planet Earth !!! ** Legally, NOBODY can FORCE them to all have PLASTIC SURGERY to maintain exclusive publicity likeness rights - They can not be micromanaged like that & would be just the same as infringing upon their OWN rights if they tried... ** Professional etiquette should encourage the use of using - a man, woman, person that bares some basic resemblance to - as a default prefix on prompt text descriptions. Not only is this transformative - it is fair use of reality... As long as the user submitted content is transformative (** meaning nonderivative) & represents details of generated artificial individuals of legal age & after created from a text prompt is then limited to basic publicly predefined general text descriptions of their created works entered from several dropdown selected menu options (ie portrait of a blonde, brunette, redhead man or woman of legal age, ETC) any submissions that bare any basic resemblance to real world actual people would be considered as fair use... ** Some type of Mattress Tag watermarking should be utilized. Either internally or at the bottom for a ticker (** for example - ACWA : Artificial Creative Works of Art - Generated 2025). ** Generalized SKU URL Labeling - a suggestion for a unique way for artists to keep track of the category of their Creative Works is having each one assigned with 3 specific SKU URL Public Identifiers of their choosing... By their User Handle, Hair Color & Year imposed time period that the Artificial subject suggestively lived in - [ For example ] ... [ Female ] • UserHandle/Brunetta-2178_AD/ • UserHandle/Blonda-3142_BC/ • UserHandle/Auburna-9142_AD/ • UserHandle/Alterna-4132_BC/... (Other Hair Color) • UserHandle/Balda-1842_AD/... (Bald) [ Male ] • UserHandle/Brunetto-2248_AD/ • UserHandle/Blondo-3578_BC/ • UserHandle/Auburno-7148_AD/ • UserHandle/Alterno-3478_BC/... (Other Hair Color) • UserHandle/Baldo-1878_AD/... (Bald) ** The [ Hair Color ] would be the FIRST name of the created model... ** The [ Year They Existed Shown ] would be their LAST name... ** The [ BC / AD ] Considered the MIDDLE name of the created model... [ URL Structure Example - https://nakedfakes.com/johnsmith_art/brunetta-2142_AD/gallery/12345.png ] [ Years 1900 AD - 2100 AD should probably be redacted for PNL Deniability but that would be a judgement call discretion of the Investor. If it did - would constitute 1st Amendment Expressional Fair Use of portraying theological individuals that existed in theory of historical past times & of individuals not existing as of yet in the future ] ** If users later demand to have less restrictions on how the created works are publicly labeled - a good solid workaround would be to allow additional PRIVATE descriptions or comments visible to the user individual account when logged in (but still invisible to the general public REGARDLESS if they also have an account). As long as kept PRIVATE - it can even be tagged as Portrait Of Marilyn Monroe Enjoying an Egg McMuffin... ** Other Side of PNL to regulate (Public Nexus Labeling) is considered Persona. Say for instance a woman wanted to buy a creative work of art that resembles the mere basic likenesses of Robert Downey Jr or Tom Brady. Or someone wanted to purchase one that bares mere basic likenesses of Angelina Jolie or Margot Robbie. Sure no problem !!! They can not, however, purchase one in an Ironman suit OR halfway dressed up in a football uniform OR decked out as a Tomb Raider OR Harley Quinn - How is that NOT Nexus connected ??? ** If someone is famously KNOWN for doing something SPECIFIC - it is generally considered publicity rights they have EARNED. They were the 1ST of baring basic resemblance of their own likeness to that profession or unique act. It can not be allowed to be published or even resold for profit. It is best to offer that rule as a general professional courtesy... ** Private Nexus details Labeling is ok. PUBLIC Nexus Labeling is NOT ok !!! ** Professional Limited Autoresponders for user accounts would ALSO be a good approach to potential buyers of creative works. Not only would it avoid mishap of unintentional PNL - it would encourage a buyer to find amazing works of art to purchase. A good generalized auto responder should basically read as - [ Although I am not able to guarantee I have a creative work of art that suits your specific request, I can guarantee I have high quality creative works that were made very unique. You are more than welcome to search my portfolio to find something you may want to purchase... ] ** It is highly recommended to encourage user submission engagement to further enrich their generative creative works with Adobe Photoshop (** editing out any extra arms, legs, hands, fingers or toes). That way, not only would artists be able to correct any AI drafted defects, they can ALSO proclaim FULL rightful attribution creative custody rights of their submissions. If any illicit intent was done in bad faith against the true intent & purpose without permission (ie such as reselling other artists creative works or intent to use as harrasment or defamatory) the guilty party involved would face not just ONE oppositioner but TWO (The harrassed party & the digital artists with their creative attribution custody rights infringed upon). ** It is important to express to buyers purchasing creative works of art that had any basic resemblance likenesses to celebrities (For Example) Emilia Clarke, Emma Watson, Sandra Bullock or even Brie Larson (LEGALLY they can) - that they should REFRAIN from sending it to them or any of their friends, family or network of associates (that part is NOT legal). They never ask for them & is considered unwanted solicitation - Being chased by Angry Pacmans is NOT very wise - It is encouraged to promote the use of common sense - NO LEWDNESS !!! ** TRUE works of Art passes the 3 Prong Miller Test against Obscenity. Full Frontal Genitalia is acceptable. Any depictions of Explicit Graphic Hardcore Sex loses its cause value for 1st Amendment Rights protected under Free Speech. In other words - it is even protected under Artistic value to have depictions of women NAKED with animals - they just can not be depicted to actually be having SEX with animals (OR humans for that matter). ** ALL Creative works of art displayed or sold should be kept intended for private individual use only... ** This brand should NEVER be marketed as a celebrity hub. Although it may become likely buyers would cherry pick on works of art that has a few that may bare similar visual likenesses - it is best to keep in mind the overall market demand for High Resolution Licensed & artificially created nude art in general. The intent needs to be not to harass, shame, embarrass, annoy or alarm ANY human being but to AMAZE & BESTOW the BEAUTY of the original works of ART generated to the growing community of graphic artists & illustrators alike supporting 1st Amendment rights & free speech of creative original works of art... Mankind has the DUTY to make this a BETTER World - One that people can RESPECT & APPRECIATE the FULL rights of EVERYONE from BOTH sides of the FENCE - To do this & we can FINALLY proclaim to be true adults again...